Primary question
Which material and size runs fastest on which line, with enough runs to trust the answer?
Weighted ctn/hr
Total cartons divided by total hours. Big production runs carry more weight than short test runs.
Shift read
Overall shift rate can be distorted by product mix. Use the By Product shift table for fair comparisons.
Rate per material - size
Current = total cartons / total hours. Best 25% = average of the fastest quarter of runs. Headroom shows how far normal performance is from proven good runs.
| Material | Size | Description | Current ctn/hr | Best 25% | Headroom | vs prior | Runs | Cartons | Last run |
|---|
Shift breakdown - apples-to-apples
Only material+size combos that both shifts ran. This is the fairer view of shift performance.
| Material | Size | 1st ctn/hr | 2nd ctn/hr | Delta | Winner | Runs 1st / 2nd |
|---|
Recommended line by product
Best observed line for each material+size in the selected period. Confidence is based on run count and carton volume.
| Material | Size | Description | Recommended line | Best ctn/hr | Next best | Advantage | Runs | Cartons | Lines tested | Confidence |
|---|
Material x Line heatmap
Routing view: for each material, green is the fastest line and red is the slowest line. Empty means it has not been run there.
Line scorecards
Each line's actual work mix, rate, and rank against other lines that ran the same product.
| Date | Shift | Line | Material | Size | Description | Cartons | Hours | Ctn/hr | Notes - Op |
|---|
Anomalies - runs that look off
Single runs more than 2 standard deviations from their material+size average. Check these first for bad hours/cartons, unusual downtime, or training runs.
| z-score | Date | Material | Size | Line - Shift | Cartons | Hours | Rate | Group mean | Expected range |
|---|